It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Really? What about the great Lewis Gilbert. Plenty of impressive and diverse non Bond work on his CV.
And give me TSWLM over SF any day.
Gilbert is awesome. Alfie and Educating Rita are superb. He doesn't take himself too seriously either, which I think is an admirable and rarely found trait these days, particularly among directors.
Gilbert hasn't directed anything that comes close to American Beauty, Road to Perdition or Revolutionary Road.
Well, their respective oeuvres aren't necessarily comparable, as is the case with most directors. They each have their strengths. I actually think Forster is arguably a more skilled film maker than either Gilbert or Mendes, but he's lost his way since moving into big budget flicks. It's totally subjective and as the only comparison of merit is Bond v Bond, Gilbert wins hands down for me.
American Beauty was good. Road to Perdition I thought was pretty poor, squandering a great cast. Haven't seen Revolutionary Road but understand it's decent.
Spectre = GOOD
Next will be bad again so go away and never return Mr Mendes.
SPECTRE = Seriously bad.
I've always enjoyed American Beauty but never got the reverence for Road To Perdition, not really seen much more of his CV.
I hope he never returns to Bond because he said all he needed to with Skyfall, unfortunately he felt pressured to come back and make the mess that is SPECTRE.
Skyfall will go down a classic despite the members here going on about what a disaster it is whereas SPECTRE is already being looked at as a seriously flawed film that wasn't worthy of following up SF.
Yes, agreed.
No more Mendes. No more family BS please.
However, with that being said, I wouldn't want him near a Bond film again. Especially since Thomas Newman is forced to come with him. He left a unique stamp on the franchise, but it's time to move on.
Or the other way around.
Spectre is all that Skyfall isn't, fun, entertaining, humorous and it doesn't take itself too seriously. Craig is finally the Bond we know for 40 years from DN to DAD.
Skyfall had some think, the franchise would now forever go on in that boring fashion, mainstreamed to death to reach a billion BO audience.
As I said it's always fun to see how the exact same things that were done in SF are now highly criticised in Spectre. That's quite schizophrenic.
Well thats because..
Bond copies Bond- Lazy and uninspired.
Any other franchise copies Bond- Genius, witty, and crafty.
Mendes made the missions too close to Bond's past and/or personal life. I really want to get back to the movies just being about the mission and getting the job done. No more links to Bond.
In 2012 it was one of the best films that's for sure. It was just a very disappointing affair overall compared to what came before, as it was aimed at the broadest possible audience which makes is so incredibly common.
QOS at least is original in its approach and has found a maybe small, but very passionate following.
It always happens with actors second film.
SPECTRE - not really bad, but disappointing after SKYFALL. Upper mid-level in the series due to the idiotic Bloberhauser angle.