It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
YOLT/OHMSS and CR/QoS were for me. I'm likely in the minority with that first one (and probably the second one), but I just love YOLT so damn much.
I didn't mind SkyFall's score initially. Bondian enough, yet almost too similar to Arnold in some respects. Spectre's score completely disappointed me.
In my controversial opinion, I feel like we're living in an era where music that is merely functional, yet unmemorable melody-wise seems to be accepted.
I was watching The Dark Knight the other day for the first time since it was released, and although Hans Zimmer's music certainly provided the appropriate atmosphere, it's not like I was humming the melody the next day. In fact I don't remember how any of the music goes.
Bond, on the other hand (in my controversial opinion) should most certainly be a step up as far as melody. Anytime I see someone on here post a comment regarding "Wine With Stacey" I immediately hear that music in my head, and am inclined to hum it. Same with "Flight Into Space".
Not only should a Bond score be memorable, each film should have it's own individual stamp so that even the casual fan will recognize which Bond film it is just based on the music.
We're on the same wavelength regarding wanting a score that's fresh and memorable and instantly recognizable after a period of time. The era of Barry ruined me, I think.
I think Arnold's QoS effort is the best score since Barry left and while perhaps not necessarily better than Barry it feels more inspired than Barry's later efforts
TB/YOLT/OHMSS
LTK/GE/TND/TWINE
CR/QOS
But to each their own.
Hear, hear!
For me, SF and SP fit that bill. And I loved the score in both as well. I hope Newman returns.
I disagree. Quite a few times I think we had two good Bond films in a row.
The best period since the 60's for me though is TLD-TND. Four good Bond films in a rough even though there was a big gap in the middle.
Why always break a film into halves? I get tired of seeing people repeatedly say that the "first half was great, but the second was terrible." Another one is; "the third act" or my favourite "I always turn it off after [...]". Ugh. Soderbergh was right, people are getting lazier at watching action movies.
Just integrate your thoughts of the entire film and that's it.
I'm breaking it into halves in order to appreciate it more & have something positive to say. If I have to look at it holistically, then it's subpar imho, because the ending always negatively impacts my impression of the entire film.
We are analyzing films here after all so I don't see what the problem is with breaking things down. At the end of the day, we all assign overall ranks on another thread.
It does, yes. Very much so. ;)
It's either him or you. Hmmm ....
I thought you were dead, Mr. Fellini.
Glad to learn you're still around.
GE > YKMN by a single ranking
TND > AWTD by a single ranking (dig both though)
TWINE > SF by at least a few rankings
and not that it matters, but yes...
DAD > WOTW
Garbage, Smith, Madge & Keys/Black are the real bottom of the dung pile stinkers for me.