It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I feel the same way. That's why I never got on board with Ridley Scott's Prometheus and Covenant. There was no reason to explain the mystery behind the xenomorphs and the space jockey. As you say, if you take it as canon, it just depletes the original of some of its power.
And yes, @DarthDimi, that isn't to say that all prequels are a horrible idea, but most of the time it's done in service to milking a franchise dry and awkwardly finding ways to incorporate their famous one liners or a particular shaping event or idiosyncrasy that makes them who they are. We don't need to see that. It's why I never bothered with Solo, I figured the film would be full of these moments.
It seems impossible. I'm desperate to get a competent writer and director attached to this series. It's like they have no interest in even trying to deliver a faithful adaptation. The blueprints are literally right there! How hard can it be?
They don't even need to plan ahead, just pick a couple of the games, and build the movie series around them.
Film 1: Resident Evil
Film 2: Resident Evil 2
Film 3: Resident Evil 3: Nemesis
Film 4: Resident Evil 4
Film 5: Resident Evil: Revelations
Film 6: Resident Evil 5
Great, now nobody will know if people are talking about the first Omen or The First Omen.
All these prequels aren't Good Omens, that's for sure.
Happy Friday 13th
AWESOME!
While I can complain about the other placings, the #1 is spot on.
I think I'd agree 100% here. I love how dirtied and fleshy his whole look is in Part VII. It's terrifying and usually the first one I picture when I think of the character.
It's a great look, very distinct. I like how there are just chunks of his flesh rotted away, on his back, his spine is visible. Though when I used to play Friday The 13th: The Game, I used to play as Pt VIII Jason. Slow moving, but compensated with a high destruction value. Not as distinctive as PtVII, but Pt VIII is another favourite looking Jason of mine.
Other than the sack head look from Pt 2, i'd agree.
Kind of like Hodder's classic head tilt, there's something both humanizing and de-humanizing about the singular glimpse we get of Jason's humanity through that one eyehole. The hockey mask may be more iconic, but I think the cycloptic sack mask might actually be creepier.
That is exactly how I feel. Those 3 are my least watched Fridays.
But having come to the sequels (from the 3rd film on), then seeing the original at a later point, it's just.... not the same without Jason (and in the hockey mask).
Bride
The rest