›

Feedback and Suggestions V2

1…1516182021…36

Comments

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    QBranch wrote: »
    No problem here. Everything upside down as usual.

    Some posts benefit from that.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    No problem here. Everything upside down as usual.
    Some posts benefit from that.
    sqooq
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,281
    QBranch wrote: »
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    No problem here. Everything upside down as usual.
    Some posts benefit from that.
    sqooq

    At least the nipples are always the right way up! ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Downunderwoman sqooq.
    12-7-2015%2B9-12-47%2BPM.png
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,281
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    Downunderwoman sqooq.
    12-7-2015%2B9-12-47%2BPM.png

    Wonder no longer!
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    The image in the My emotions! thread, which showed the code for the emojis, is no longer displaying. We are once again without ability to cartoonishly emote.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    BMW_with_missiles wrote: »
    The image in the My emotions! thread, which showed the code for the emojis, is no longer displaying. We are once again without ability to cartoonishly emote.
    Noticed that as well. I'd use the disappointed emoji, if I could remember what the damn thing was.
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    edited January 2018 Posts: 3,000
    I found this through Google image search. They don't all work, but it's something.
    large.png?1337853263
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I suggest using words.

    I prefer words as well, but sometimes an emoji can soften what would otherwise come across as a harsh comment. And I find this; =)) to be much less annoying than "lol".
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    I use them because it's annoying to be accused of being combative or offending when you're actually delivering a joke. There's sadly not a lot of room for nuance in text conversations these days, so visuals help a lot if meaning could get lost.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,138
    I've reopened this thread...
    https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/18476/my-emotions#latest

    ...to allow the posting of any relevant emoticon chart/s
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    Thank you @Benny
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,281
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote: »
    I use them because it's annoying to be accused of being combative or offending when you're actually delivering a joke. There's sadly not a lot of room for nuance in text conversations these days, so visuals help a lot if meaning could get lost.

    That neatly encapsulates how I view them too, though I used to frown on them years ago I'm sure. With them not being on the post field any more I don't really use them as much. However, that is probably a good thing as I can try better to convey my meaning with words.

    Anyway, glad to see them made available again for all members to access easily.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    They help to show that a comment is in jest rather than a personal attack,so they are very handy.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    barryt007 wrote: »
    They help to show that a comment is in jest rather than a personal attack,so they are very handy.

    Probably why I come off as an ass in some of my posts. Par for the course!
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    They help to show that a comment is in jest rather than a personal attack,so they are very handy.

    Probably why I come off as an ass in some of my posts. Par for the course!

    True Creasy ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) etc
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Our words only account for 7% of the information in conveying a message. So anything that
    Helps the reader understand the meaning of what someone has written, can only be a good
    Thing.
    After all the Berlin wall came down due to a misread statement from a party official. ;-)
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Has anyone else had EVERY post they made yesterday wiped off the system ?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    The MI6 mods took us all back in time, @barryt007.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    The MI6 mods took us all back in time, @barryt007.

    It appears so Clark !!

    Odd.........

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    It has happened all over the place.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Julie T. and the M.G.'s
    Posts: 7,021
    Daniel Craig will be on the Colbert show tomorrow. He'll most certainly be promoting Logan Lucky but there's also a chance he might reveal something about Bond, though I seriously doubt it. They aren't going to make any big announcements on a TV show.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Already? I thought they were still shooting this film. How time flies.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Not only are all posts from yesterday gone, but I got the same notifications as the previous day, as if I hadn t already read those posts.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Alright who spilled soda on the Flux Capacitor again?
    hLpvP5m.gif
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Posts have just appeared in this thread talking about Craig appearing on the Colbert show promoting Logan Lucky,but saying it was posted at 09:59/10:06 this morning ?!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Posts have just appeared in this thread talking about Craig appearing on the Colbert show promoting Logan Lucky,but saying it was posted at 09:59/10:06 this morning ?!

    A joke.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Posts have just appeared in this thread talking about Craig appearing on the Colbert show promoting Logan Lucky,but saying it was posted at 09:59/10:06 this morning ?!

    A joke.

    Weird...
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    Yes, it is a little weird. Rest assured we have our best man on to it.

    @Andi1996Ruegg , sort this mess out.
  • Master_DaharkMaster_Dahark
    Posts: 4,813
    Am I crazy or are we missing a whole days worth of posts?
Sign In or Register to comment.