EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards

11415161820

Comments

  • Posts: 4,651
    Lots of discussion re who they will cast, who will direct, music etc etc but IMHO, THE key factor is script. We have all seem Bond movies let down by poor (very poor scripts), if there is one thing Amazon (and fans) need right now (or soon), it's a great script.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,670
    patb wrote: »
    Lots of discussion re who they will cast, who will direct, music etc etc but IMHO, THE key factor is script. We have all seem Bond movies let down by poor (very poor scripts), if there is one thing Amazon (and fans) need right now (or soon), it's a great script.

    A great script + Martin Campbell = great Bond film.
  • edited February 22 Posts: 408
    bondywondy wrote: »
    .
    Seve wrote: »
    Very little to say that hasn't already been said. This is a real shame, and try as I might, I find it hard to be optimistic. I also can't shake the feeling that Barbara may have been backed into a corner somehow. Despite the constant accusations that she's no longer interested in Bond (which I've never agreed with), I don't think this is how she wanted things to turn out, at all.

    What has happened makes sense to me

    Daniel Craig was Barbara's choice for Bond and the Craig era films represented her vision of what James Bond could be, so from an "artistic" standpoint she'd given it her best shot and there was nothing left to do, other than tred water

    On the other hand, selling now, while there is still 10 years or so to run on the copyright, makes the best financial sense in terms of maximising the sale value.

    Also explains why NTTD ends as it does... Babs dropping the mic

    However the "life" of Fleming's Book Bond has continued long after the author's death, via Kingley Amis, John Gardner and others, and even includes a "Young Bond" series and a "Double O" trilogy. I'm sure there are mixed opinions on how those have worked out and whether they are a blessing or a blasphemy

    Movie Bond will now encounter the equivalent fate...

    My guess is once Craig convinced Eon he wasn't going to come back...

    1) The NTTD script was altered to kill off Bond. This may have been one of the reasons why Danny Boyle and John Hodge left Bond 25.

    2) Michael G Wilson told Barbara he was retiring after the release of NTTD.

    3) Barbara Broccoli, perhaps with great reluctance, decided she didn't want to carry on without Wilson so she too would retire.

    The intention was to sell their share to MGM or anyone else giving them a better offer. Amazon came along and bought MGM in 2022. This was the moment Barbara Broccoli knew her tenure was over. She knew Amazon was very unlikely to share her vision of Bond nor compromise.

    Under legal advice Broccoli was told to stall any development on Bond 26. "Wait two to three years because this will the best bargaining tactic to raise the value of Eon's stake. If you don't sell up straight away you get the buyer to raise their offer."

    Three years from the purchase of MGM and Amazon offer Eon an amount that's too good to turn down. A reported billion dollars (which may include film/merchandise residuals in perpetuity). Barbara Broccoli says "yes, I accept your offer."

    My guess is that's the course of history. If the Deadline article is accurate then Broccoli didn't want to continue without Wilson. Maybe she needed him as moral support. Maybe Wilson was just as important in the film making process so with him in retirement Broccoli felt it was time to retire too. Unlike Cubby Broccoli, she has other projects. Cubby went solo in the mid 1970s but I don't think he produced other films. His only focus was James Bond. It's possible it's too much work, too much stress for Barbara Broccoli to produce future Bond films without her brother. She has to deal with Amazon questioning her decisions plus the stress making other non Bond films or any theatre projects.

    It's possible Eon decided to retire when Craig told them he wasn't coming back for Bond 26. Eon allowed Craig to kill off his Bond because Eon had decided No Time To Die was their final film. At the time of release we never knew that, we just assumed Eon had made a very controversial decision to kill off Bond (!) but Eon were fully committed to a reboot, but in hindsight four years later it's possible Eon had decided to retire when NTTD was in production.
    .

    This all might have been the case but I disagree that Broccoli knew she was selling the franchise after Craig’s final film or Wilson’s retirement. If there is a singular, silver bullet answer, then I believe the stalemate with Amazon is it; if not, then it was the final straw. It wouldn’t surprise me if Amazon threatened EON with legal action.

    Barbara’s tenure was hamstrung by MGM’s financial woes. I think EON would have stuck to a steady three year development throughout the 90s and 2000s had MGM not needed a Bond film every two years between ‘95 and ‘99, and had MGM not needed a cash infusion from SONY and a hedge fund from ‘02 - ‘12. We may have even gotten better Brosnan films with more development time and more Craig films without MGM’s financial issues.

    I think Barbara didn’t want to spend the next several months or years fighting Amazon the way her father fought MGM between ‘89 and ‘93/‘94. I see her partial sell to Amazon as proof that she truly cared about the property. When great estates become encumbered, the original owners don’t tear down the manor to spite the buyers. Care is taken to preserve the history, architecture and overall character.

    It seems from the very beginning of franchise, Bond as attracted jealousy and ire from competitors and people who thought they could do a better job. From Fleming’s court case against Kevin McClory and Jack Whittingham, to the impasse with Amazon. While, I do think there will be some sort of 007 TV show (not with Bond), I also think that Amazon committing themselves to theatrical releases by developing their own international distribution is a good sign that Bond will continue to be released theatrically.

    If Amazon can produce a spin-off as good as The Penguin and a Bond film as lauded as Casino Royale or Skyfall or The Batman, then we’ll all be singing a different tune. Given the shifts in theatrical expectations, Bond 26 could do the same numbers as NTTD or The Batman to be a considered a success so long as the Rotten Tomatoes score begins with an 8 or a 9.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,308
    The movie was already shot and finished by the time the Amazon purchase became a thing. The original deal back in 2019 was that Eon and MGM made a two film deal with Universal Studios, first for NTTD and then BOND 26.
  • Posts: 2,130
    CrabKey wrote: »
    CrabKey wrote: »
    They love gold. They love only gold. Only gold. They love gold.
    I suppose that's one way to look at it. Everyone and everything has its price.

    I am disappointed as I feel something has been lost. But then billionaires can have anything they want and control whatever they desire. In some sense, no Bond story can be more fantastic than what is happening now. Oh, well.

    I like how nobody cared about Billionaires until two seconds ago, and its only a problem now because Elon Musk has made a public foray into politics.

    I've never been a fan of billionaires. With few exceptions they're cut from the same cloth. When you can buy anything you want, where's the thrill? Power and control.

    I would have to agree somewhat, however you are now saying you don't like Barbara Broccoli by that standard.

    I said with few exceptions.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    edited February 22 Posts: 585
    Theres been an allusion to this, but does anybody think Amazon was "strong-arming" Eon or threatening to sue?
  • Posts: 9,909
    Lyrics i wrote about this whole thing

    Verse 1
    I heard the news and was sad
    My nostalgic heart felt bad
    Could the money makers work
    Could the truth be so stark
    Just a dream since i was a teen
    Just a thought of a has been

    Chorus
    Where are you EON these days
    Where are you amongst of frames
    The dream from teen to thirty
    Among the Craig and Connery
    From the casual everyman
    To the Dalton and the Brosnan


    Verse 2
    Where are the heros of old
    Can they be so bold
    From Harry and Cubby
    To Babs so bubbly
    Michael the writer
    Gregg the learner
    To the dreams of youth
    All spoken to a lawyer of blutooth


    Chorus

    Bridge
    I sometimes look at the inspiration of others
    The influencers the corporate mothers
    Do we have any individuality left
    Can we order it in fabric felt
    Dont ask me for answers dont ask me for questions
    For the bone man comes and steals your suggestions


    Guitar solo

    Verse 3
    What the hell are these thoughts
    What are dreams or oughts
    We can drive through the nightmare
    And we can go through the fear
    Do we know the future as it flies
    The sun still sets and rises

  • edited February 22 Posts: 453
    I did some research on Amazon. It's mind boggling data.
    Amazon is
    second-largest company in the world (based on consolidated revenue according to the Fortune Global 500 2024 rankings),
    12th-most visited website in the world,
    second-largest private employer in the United
    In 2021, it surpassed Walmart as the world's largest retailer outside of China,
    As of 2023, it is the world's largest online retailer.

    The second biggest revenue company in the world own James Bond - has full creative control. Eon had no chance to determine the direction of the franchise. How can you tell the second biggest company in the world "er, actually we don't think your ideas are good."

    It was never going to happen.

    Broccoli and Wilson were never going to win the creativity battle with Amazon. My guess is Cubby Broccoli would have tried to flatter Amazon. That might have led to a suitable compromise. Imagine going to Amazon studio meetings and not saying you're "f-king idiots" but doing the opposite. "Yes, your ideas about Bond not being a hero sound fascinating. I'm sure we can do a screenplay making Bond more heroic. And maybe you'll consider raising the budget?"

    Something like that. Give Amazon the bullsh*t they wanna hear. Try to flatter their collective ego and that way they're more likely to compromise.

    Barbara Broccoli is not as smart as some people claim. She was extremely stupid to kill off James Bond because that automatically led to zero plan moving forward. As soon as she agreed to kill off Bond that meant the franchise was in limbo. No clear idea what to do next. A monumental error of judgement.

    And the second monumental error of judgement was not to try to appease Bezos, Salke and the other executives at Amazon MGM Studios. If she did call them "f-king idiots" that automatically dropped Amazon's respect for Eon. It's not a good business strategy because you show yourself to be too emotional or too unwilling to compromise. Barbara Broccoli could and did play hardball with the old MGM because they needed Eon but Amazon doesn't need Eon. All they need is Eon's 50 percent stake to completely own Bond or the next best option - own full creative control.

    Said in hindsight, the Eon Bond film franchise was doomed when

    1) Craig and Eon foolishly, recklessly killed off Bond and thereby sabotaged a clear way forward for the franchise (which I would consider gross negligence),

    2) Refusing or unable to compromise with Amazon. Eon's legal team should have reminded Broccoli - "you're dealing with the second richest company on the planet. You better be prepared to be civil to them and compromise or it's game over. Amazon will file the most harsh lawsuit possible and potentially bankrupt you."

    If she never adopted that approach she was doomed to failure.

    It's possible she wanted to quit anyway so maybe it all worked out for her. Killing Bond is the most compelling evidence she wanted out.

    My guess is Cubby Broccoli would have found a different way. He wouldn't have killed off Bond and he would have tried his very best to co-produce with Amazon. Sadly it wasn't meant to be.
  • Posts: 2,041
    The movie was already shot and finished by the time the Amazon purchase became a thing. The original deal back in 2019 was that Eon and MGM made a two film deal with Universal Studios, first for NTTD and then BOND 26.

    im pretty sure the deal with Universal Studios was for 1 film NTTD.
  • Posts: 2,041
    I wonder what would have happened had Spectre been Craigs final Bond film and Bond 25 was with a new actor before Amazon acquired Bond?
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,110
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    I wonder what would have happened had Spectre been Craigs final Bond film and Bond 25 was with a new actor before Amazon acquired Bond?

    Yeah they're in a more favourable position with it happening this way around, they can set terms for the new actor and make him appear in spinoffs etc. whereas I doubt he'd have had to in the version you imagine.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,471
    The podcast (it's back!) alludes to something Gregg Wilson did that "wasn't great"?

    What is it?
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,472
    Let’s say the Amazon Bond project collapses under the weight of its own greed. Interest dwindles, and sales decline. Then what? Could another party step in and bid for the rights to Bond, or would Amazon be content simply maintaining the existing catalogue without producing new material?
  • SeveSeve The island of Lemoy
    Posts: 473
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Let’s say the Amazon Bond project collapses under the weight of its own greed. Interest dwindles, and sales decline. Then what? Could another party step in and bid for the rights to Bond...?

    Yes, of course, Elon Musk could by it...

    James Bond in a Tesla anyone?

    BAhfysZvCkUIcHxwZVg478noI-vURzcZu0T5aOu16hQ.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=de89ee2f64d138217bcdc910297e5a75a72c802e
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,110
    echo wrote: »
    The podcast (it's back!) alludes to something Gregg Wilson did that "wasn't great"?

    What is it?

    Which podcast is that?
    I would guess it's referring to Road To A Million, maybe?

    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Let’s say the Amazon Bond project collapses under the weight of its own greed. Interest dwindles, and sales decline. Then what? Could another party step in and bid for the rights to Bond, or would Amazon be content simply maintaining the existing catalogue without producing new material?

    I think they'd likely hang onto the rights probably; it's an asset in the bank. But yeah, who knows.
  • Posts: 2,041
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Let’s say the Amazon Bond project collapses under the weight of its own greed. Interest dwindles, and sales decline. Then what? Could another party step in and bid for the rights to Bond, or would Amazon be content simply maintaining the existing catalogue without producing new material?

    The latter is what I'm worried about.
  • mtm wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    The podcast (it's back!) alludes to something Gregg Wilson did that "wasn't great"?

    What is it?

    Which podcast is that?
    I would guess it's referring to Road To A Million, maybe?

    The one this forum is associated with - James Bond & Friends.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited 12:01am Posts: 17,110
    Oh okay thanks, I like Phil and Sean, I'll give it a go.
  • edited 12:02am Posts: 6,770
    Loved the podcast. Missed those guys. Congrats to them, very nice points and questions raised. Hope to see them back soon.
  • Posts: 16,346
    Great podcast. I loved it. I've been missing James Bond & Friends lately.
  • Posts: 408
    Burgess wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    .
    Seve wrote: »
    Very little to say that hasn't already been said. This is a real shame, and try as I might, I find it hard to be optimistic. I also can't shake the feeling that Barbara may have been backed into a corner somehow. Despite the constant accusations that she's no longer interested in Bond (which I've never agreed with), I don't think this is how she wanted things to turn out, at all.

    What has happened makes sense to me

    Daniel Craig was Barbara's choice for Bond and the Craig era films represented her vision of what James Bond could be, so from an "artistic" standpoint she'd given it her best shot and there was nothing left to do, other than tred water

    On the other hand, selling now, while there is still 10 years or so to run on the copyright, makes the best financial sense in terms of maximising the sale value.

    Also explains why NTTD ends as it does... Babs dropping the mic

    However the "life" of Fleming's Book Bond has continued long after the author's death, via Kingley Amis, John Gardner and others, and even includes a "Young Bond" series and a "Double O" trilogy. I'm sure there are mixed opinions on how those have worked out and whether they are a blessing or a blasphemy

    Movie Bond will now encounter the equivalent fate...

    My guess is once Craig convinced Eon he wasn't going to come back...

    1) The NTTD script was altered to kill off Bond. This may have been one of the reasons why Danny Boyle and John Hodge left Bond 25.

    2) Michael G Wilson told Barbara he was retiring after the release of NTTD.

    3) Barbara Broccoli, perhaps with great reluctance, decided she didn't want to carry on without Wilson so she too would retire.

    The intention was to sell their share to MGM or anyone else giving them a better offer. Amazon came along and bought MGM in 2022. This was the moment Barbara Broccoli knew her tenure was over. She knew Amazon was very unlikely to share her vision of Bond nor compromise.

    Under legal advice Broccoli was told to stall any development on Bond 26. "Wait two to three years because this will the best bargaining tactic to raise the value of Eon's stake. If you don't sell up straight away you get the buyer to raise their offer."

    Three years from the purchase of MGM and Amazon offer Eon an amount that's too good to turn down. A reported billion dollars (which may include film/merchandise residuals in perpetuity). Barbara Broccoli says "yes, I accept your offer."

    My guess is that's the course of history. If the Deadline article is accurate then Broccoli didn't want to continue without Wilson. Maybe she needed him as moral support. Maybe Wilson was just as important in the film making process so with him in retirement Broccoli felt it was time to retire too. Unlike Cubby Broccoli, she has other projects. Cubby went solo in the mid 1970s but I don't think he produced other films. His only focus was James Bond. It's possible it's too much work, too much stress for Barbara Broccoli to produce future Bond films without her brother. She has to deal with Amazon questioning her decisions plus the stress making other non Bond films or any theatre projects.

    It's possible Eon decided to retire when Craig told them he wasn't coming back for Bond 26. Eon allowed Craig to kill off his Bond because Eon had decided No Time To Die was their final film. At the time of release we never knew that, we just assumed Eon had made a very controversial decision to kill off Bond (!) but Eon were fully committed to a reboot, but in hindsight four years later it's possible Eon had decided to retire when NTTD was in production.
    .

    This all might have been the case but I disagree that Broccoli knew she was selling the franchise after Craig’s final film or Wilson’s retirement. If there is a singular, silver bullet answer, then I believe the stalemate with Amazon is it; if not, then it was the final straw. It wouldn’t surprise me if Amazon threatened EON with legal action.

    Barbara’s tenure was hamstrung by MGM’s financial woes. I think EON would have stuck to a steady three year development throughout the 90s and 2000s had MGM not needed a Bond film every two years between ‘95 and ‘99, and had MGM not needed a cash infusion from SONY and a hedge fund from ‘02 - ‘12. We may have even gotten better Brosnan films with more development time and more Craig films without MGM’s financial issues.

    I think Barbara didn’t want to spend the next several months or years fighting Amazon the way her father fought MGM between ‘89 and ‘93/‘94. I see her partial sell to Amazon as proof that she truly cared about the property. When great estates become encumbered, the original owners don’t tear down the manor to spite the buyers. Care is taken to preserve the history, architecture and overall character.
    bondywondy wrote: »
    I did some research on Amazon. It's mind boggling data.
    Amazon is
    second-largest company in the world (based on consolidated revenue according to the Fortune Global 500 2024 rankings),
    12th-most visited website in the world,
    second-largest private employer in the United
    In 2021, it surpassed Walmart as the world's largest retailer outside of China,
    As of 2023, it is the world's largest online retailer.

    The second biggest revenue company in the world own James Bond - has full creative control. Eon had no chance to determine the direction of the franchise. How can you tell the second biggest company in the world "er, actually we don't think your ideas are good."

    It was never going to happen.

    Broccoli and Wilson were never going to win the creativity battle with Amazon. My guess is Cubby Broccoli would have tried to flatter Amazon. That might have led to a suitable compromise. Imagine going to Amazon studio meetings and not saying you're "f-king idiots" but doing the opposite. "Yes, your ideas about Bond not being a hero sound fascinating. I'm sure we can do a screenplay making Bond more heroic. And maybe you'll consider raising the budget?"

    Something like that. Give Amazon the bullsh*t they wanna hear. Try to flatter their collective ego and that way they're more likely to compromise.

    Barbara Broccoli is not as smart as some people claim. She was extremely stupid to kill off James Bond because that automatically led to zero plan moving forward. As soon as she agreed to kill off Bond that meant the franchise was in limbo. No clear idea what to do next. A monumental error of judgement.

    And the second monumental error of judgement was not to try to appease Bezos, Salke and the other executives at Amazon MGM Studios. If she did call them "f-king idiots" that automatically dropped Amazon's respect for Eon. It's not a good business strategy because you show yourself to be too emotional or too unwilling to compromise. Barbara Broccoli could and did play hardball with the old MGM because they needed Eon but Amazon doesn't need Eon. All they need is Eon's 50 percent stake to completely own Bond or the next best option - own full creative control.

    Said in hindsight, the Eon Bond film franchise was doomed when

    1) Craig and Eon foolishly, recklessly killed off Bond and thereby sabotaged a clear way forward for the franchise (which I would consider gross negligence),

    2) Refusing or unable to compromise with Amazon. Eon's legal team should have reminded Broccoli - "you're dealing with the second richest company on the planet. You better be prepared to be civil to them and compromise or it's game over. Amazon will file the most harsh lawsuit possible and potentially bankrupt you."

    If she never adopted that approach she was doomed to failure.

    It's possible she wanted to quit anyway so maybe it all worked out for her. Killing Bond is the most compelling evidence she wanted out.

    My guess is Cubby Broccoli would have found a different way. He wouldn't have killed off Bond and he would have tried his very best to co-produce with Amazon. Sadly it wasn't meant to be.

    This assessment is ad hoc.

  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 585
    In what way do people think that Amazon was unwilling to move forward with another Bond film? Basically saying we wont work with you so you might as well sell?
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,471
    I think Barbara held out against Amazon for four years, but they're Amazon, so eventually she had to cave.
  • ShakenNotStirredShakenNotStirred Canada, True North Strong and Free
    Posts: 1,404
    It’s strange that only a couple weeks ago she was basically quoted as being very displeased with Amazon ( to put mildly). Thought we would be in for a longer negotiation.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,851
    echo wrote: »
    The podcast (it's back!) alludes to something Gregg Wilson did that "wasn't great"?

    What is it?
    Possibly referencing that Wall Street Journal article from December, where Gregg Wilson claimed* to want to "modernize Bond away from a straight white male".

    *Grain of salt whether there's any truth to it of course, but what if the conversation went like this:

    Barbara: "Are you ready to take the reigns?"
    Gregg: "Are you ready for Alex Jamelia Bond?"
    Barbara: "Never mind, I'll phone Jeff."

    https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond-26-barbara-broccoli-amazon-impasse
  • Posts: 2,130
    (Roughly to the tune of Thunderball)

    He's not a straight white feller
    He's a modern Bond altogether
    He can be what he wants to be
    As long as he doesn't look like Daniel C


    I prefer to see Bond films first in the cinema. I hope that can continue. But with everything out of joint, who knows where all this goes?


  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,308
    I think Bond should remain male and still fancy women, 100%. I don’t mind his ethnicity changing, because in the 2020s it really doesn’t matter what his ethnicity is, especially since few stories ever make that relevant to the plot. Did being white in TOMORROW NEVER DIES bear any relevance?

    If his whiteness did factor in anything recently it’s probably SKYFALL, which leaned into the idea of Bond being a symbolic representation of the British Empire. A man out of time, which Silva mocks during the interrogation. If future films lean further into that conceit, that’s a solid argument to stick to Bond being white.

    Of course the easiest argument would be setting the films back in the 1950s to Fleming’s era, in which case a black James Bond would look out of place in that time period.

    Sorry if my “wokeness” offended anyone here.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    edited 4:37am Posts: 585
    I think Bond should remain male and still fancy women, 100%. I don’t mind his ethnicity changing, because in the 2020s it really doesn’t matter what his ethnicity is, especially since few stories ever make that relevant to the plot. Did being white in TOMORROW NEVER DIES bear any relevance?

    If his whiteness did factor in anything recently it’s probably SKYFALL, which leaned into the idea of Bond being a symbolic representation of the British Empire. A man out of time, which Silva mocks during the interrogation. If future films lean further into that conceit, that’s a solid argument to stick to Bond being white.

    Of course the easiest argument would be setting the films back in the 1950s to Fleming’s era, in which case a black James Bond would look out of place in that time period.

    Sorry if my “wokeness” offended anyone here.

    You have just received the Ian Fleming seal of disapproval. You say it doesn't matter, then why change it in the first place if it doesn't matter? Clearly it does to some people.

    Bond is an English hero, (Yes, Scottish father, half swiss mother i know) his ethnicity and culutre is core to who he is. Changing that leads to tangible and intangible differences which would render him alien and not recognizable to the character who we all know and Ian Fleming created. Yaphet Kotto said as much.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    edited 6:40am Posts: 8,308
    You say it doesn't matter, then why change it in the first place if it doesn't matter?

    Why are you asking me? It’s not my decision to make. I really don’t care if they keep him white or make him black. That’s how much of a non-issue Bond’s ethnicity is to me, at least when it comes to a story or plot where his skin color bears no relevance.

    But what do I know? I accepted a Bond with blonde hair and was accused of not being a true fan for that.
  • buddyoldchapbuddyoldchap Formerly known as JeremyBondon
    Posts: 254
    You say it doesn't matter, then why change it in the first place if it doesn't matter?

    Why are you asking me? It’s not my decision to make. I really don’t care if they keep him white or make him black. That’s how much of a non-issue Bond’s ethnicity is to me, at least when it comes to a story or plot where his skin color bears no relevance.

    But what do I know? I accepted a Bond with blonde hair and was accused of not being a true fan for that.

    Exactly, to you
Sign In or Register to comment.