EoN sells up - Amazon MGM to produce 007 going forwards

12527293031

Comments

  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,300
    Please note :

    It has been asked politely that all political discussion is not relevant to a James Bond forum.
    Bond is a fictional character who will remain that. Posting should for the most part be fun and remaining in the escapist world which James Bond inhabits.

    So with this in mind any political post discussing Trump, Russia or any other political viewpoints will be removed.

    If the discussion of politics is something you wish to do, then Private Messages are your avenue.

    Thank you
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    Mallory wrote: »
    That's brilliant - more teddy bear merch like everyone was clamouring for. Long gone are the days of Zeon wristwatch tie-ins and play sets with molded environments.

    Now we live in a world of 'collectible designer toys' that neither parent can afford nor child can touch.

    Amazon, please ask the fans what merch we want.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,336
    I’ll never understand fans whining about the 007 store for selling luxury items, as if that’s the only thing they sell there and nothing else is affordable.

    For example: https://007store.com/en-us/collections/james-bond-games-and-puzzles/products/james-bond-007-debut-poster-1000-pc-puzzle?variant=39314579816603

    There you go. A jigsaw puzzle for just $20. I don’t think that’s gonna set anyone back for months. Or is it really just the collector mentality of wanting to collect as much merch as possible and a good chunk of the merch just happens to be way beyond the budget of some fans?
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    I do tend to agree, there's affordable stuff on there like toy cars and good quality T shirts. There's high end stuff too but it's James Bond, the idea is that he's premium. No one's complaining about the tie-in Omega wristwatches or special edition Aston Martins.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,336
    I think the most expensive item I ever bought from that store was this Christmas tree ornament.

    https://007store.com/en-us/products/james-bond-family-crest-tree-decoration?variant=43019529060507
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    Yes that's fun. I bought the LTK score from them a few weeks ago though and that cost more!
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    Guys I'm just bitter at the lack of tech-y, hands-on toy merch that was available up until nearly twenty years ago. It's non-existent now. Who knows, maybe a return of that gear will get more kids interested in Bond.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,336
    Bond always felt too adult of a franchise to cater to kids like other franchises, but that may be a generational thing. As a kid growing up in the mid to late 90s I’d see tons of toys like action figures for Power Rangers, Batman, and Star Wars, yet that was virtually non-existent for Bond. The only thing Bond seemed to have to appeal to kids were the video games like GoldenEye and onward. Of course that all came to an end in 2012 after 007 Legends flopped big time.

    I know Bond merch catered to kids a lot more in the 60s with action figures, lunch boxes, and so on, but that just seems weird to think of now.
  • edited February 25 Posts: 4,674
    Bond always felt too adult of a franchise to cater to kids like other franchises, but that may be a generational thing. As a kid growing up in the mid to late 90s I’d see tons of toys like action figures for Power Rangers, Batman, and Star Wars, yet that was virtually non-existent for Bond. The only thing Bond seemed to have to appeal to kids were the video games like GoldenEye and onward. Of course that all came to an end in 2012 after 007 Legends flopped big time.

    I know Bond merch catered to kids a lot more in the 60s with action figures, lunch boxes, and so on, but that just seems weird to think of now.

    I vaguely remember getting given a couple of books on the Bond films that were I guess aimed at younger audiences when I a kid. I don’t remember what they were called but we’re going back to the last days of the Brosnan era, if not just after, and they had things like a simplified version of Bond’s dossier, a section on villains, gadgets, and a mixture of stills from the films and illustrations, particularly showing action sequences. Pretty sure there was a history of Bond one as well I got given a bit later which had some photographs of those 60s kids toys and I got the sense that was a bit odd too. That and the games were big (although I was too young for GE. Agent Under Fire, Nightfire and EON are the ones I played).

    I’m don’t know how much Bond as a franchise suits kids toys now one way or the other. I have absolutely no interest in it regardless. Most kids if they really get into Bond are, what, 12ish generally? I suspect the ideal younger audience for Bond will be more along the lines of late teens/early 20s anyway, and that merchandise should be more aimed at them.
  • edited February 25 Posts: 483
    Will Amazon's first Bond film be classified as

    Bond 1

    Or Bond 26


    There's no reason for Amazon to consider it Bond 26 because it's not a continuation of Eon's 25 films. A new era could mean the next Bond film is #1. The BBC and Disney did that with Doctor Who. When Ncuti Gatwa was cast as the Doctor his first series/season was classified as #1. In terms of overall continuity it was actually series/season #39.

    Bond 26 may be Bond 1. 😉

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR9R5dqUmT8t36-YIliRdboyLlYB8Kj4IgpJw&s

  • edited February 25 Posts: 4,674
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Will Amazon's first Bond film be classified as

    Bond 1

    Or Bond 26

    ?
    There's no reason for Amazon to consider it Bond 26 because it's not a continuation of Eon's 25 films. A new era could mean the next Bond film is #1. The BBC and Disney did that with Doctor Who. When Ncuti Gatwa was cast as the Doctor his first series/season was classified as #1. In terms of overall continuity it was actually series/season #39.

    I guess even when it was rebooted in the 2000s it went to series one again (Nu-Who I suppose). I’m not sure it’s quite as relevant to Bond as the public know them through their titles, and there’s probably a practical reason why for tv they defaulted to series 1 both times.

    I can see it going either way. I think Amazon could be eager to prove that this is still the ‘official’ Bond series now so in the run up to a title refer to it as Bond 26. That and Bond 1 is still DN… they may just not acknowledge it at all and just drop a title (and the press will refer to it as Bond 26 most likely).
  • Posts: 2,065
    Its gonna be Bond 26
  • edited February 25 Posts: 483
    I guess season 1 of Doctor Who sounds fresh and new whereas calling it season 39 makes it sound less appealing?

    Restarting the Bond franchise from 1 might upset some Bond fans but if all the marketing refers to the new film as Bond 1 - it is a good way to confirm this is a new beginning.

    Bond 1 out in 2027!

    😉
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,468
    007HallY wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Will Amazon's first Bond film be classified as

    Bond 1

    Or Bond 26

    ?
    There's no reason for Amazon to consider it Bond 26 because it's not a continuation of Eon's 25 films. A new era could mean the next Bond film is #1. The BBC and Disney did that with Doctor Who. When Ncuti Gatwa was cast as the Doctor his first series/season was classified as #1. In terms of overall continuity it was actually series/season #39.

    I guess even when it was rebooted in the 2000s it went to series one again (Nu-Who I suppose). I’m not sure it’s quite as relevant to Bond as the public know them through their titles, and there’s probably a practical reason why for tv they defaulted to series 1 both times.

    I can see it going either way. I think Amazon could be eager to prove that this is still the ‘official’ Bond series now so in the run up to a title refer to it as Bond 26. That and Bond 1 is still DN… they may just not acknowledge it at all and just drop a title (and the press will refer to it as Bond 26 most likely).

    Personally speaking I would hope that Amazon would call the new film Bond 26 prior to it receiving its proper title. I think this would be fitting out of respect for the legacy of Cubby, Saltzman and Barbara and Michael. It would also show that Amazon is continuing as the official owner (along with Barbara and Michael) of the film James Bond copyright. Starting to number the films from one onwards seems a bad idea to me if they are trying to project a "business as usual" approach to their recent acquisition of the rights to the James Bond character.
  • Posts: 483
    Dragonpol wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    bondywondy wrote: »
    Will Amazon's first Bond film be classified as

    Bond 1

    Or Bond 26

    ?
    There's no reason for Amazon to consider it Bond 26 because it's not a continuation of Eon's 25 films. A new era could mean the next Bond film is #1. The BBC and Disney did that with Doctor Who. When Ncuti Gatwa was cast as the Doctor his first series/season was classified as #1. In terms of overall continuity it was actually series/season #39.

    I guess even when it was rebooted in the 2000s it went to series one again (Nu-Who I suppose). I’m not sure it’s quite as relevant to Bond as the public know them through their titles, and there’s probably a practical reason why for tv they defaulted to series 1 both times.

    I can see it going either way. I think Amazon could be eager to prove that this is still the ‘official’ Bond series now so in the run up to a title refer to it as Bond 26. That and Bond 1 is still DN… they may just not acknowledge it at all and just drop a title (and the press will refer to it as Bond 26 most likely).

    Personally speaking I would hope that Amazon would call the new film Bond 26 prior to it receiving its proper title. I think this would be fitting out of respect for the legacy of Cubby, Saltzman and Barbara and Michael. It would also show that Amazon is continuing as the official owner (along with Barbara and Michael) of the film James Bond copyright. Starting to number the films from one onwards seems a bad idea to me if they are trying to project a "business as usual" approach to their recent acquisition of the rights to the James Bond character.

    Good points! I suppose Amazon may not care though.

    It will be interesting to see if Amazon market Bond 26 as "all new, an exciting new era of James Bond Begins!" or if they'll downplay the new era.

    Given Bond died in NTTD you would think they'd need to hype Bond 26 as a new start. Really push it as a radical new take on the franchise. Use social media to market Bond 26 as brand new rather than a continuation of Eon's films.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    It's annoying and confusing when they reset the number like that. Calling it #1 definitely smacks of disrespect and dismissal for all that came before. Personally I will be referring to it as B26 until the title is revealed.

    Then if the movie is shit I'll go back to calling it B26 out of spite, or 'number 2'.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    The 'Bond xx' holding titles aren't really very public-facing anyway, unlike the season numbers of a TV show which appear in the Radio Times listings, on the Blu Ray cover, on the streaming pages etc. That doesn't happen with the B numbers. No-one with any modicum of intelligence still calls the last Bond film 'Bond 25' - everyone in the world knows it by its title. So a change in that format wouldn't have the same sort of message as changing season numbers does.
  • edited February 25 Posts: 483
    Yeah, Amazon probably won't change it.

    Based on MI6's new update on the Amazon deal...
    Trusted insiders at Amazon Studios confirmed to MI6 that the decision was a shock. "Nobody expected them to take the offer," said one with knowledge of the relationship since Amazon's acquisition of MGM back in 2022. The studio has been at an impasse with EON since the MGM takeover was completed, and "every few months we would approach with a deal but they rebuffed them." It is not known what finally tipped the balance, besides the amount of cash, but it "caught everyone here out by surprise." An email thread circulating around team members after the announcement was vitriolic, "as if a battle had been won."

    I'm sticking with Eon did intend to quit after NTTD. I think this part...
    The studio has been at an impasse with EON since the MGM takeover was completed, and "every few months we would approach with a deal but they rebuffed them."

    ... was Eon stalling to get a higher offer. I don't mean that to be cynical but business is business. If Eon wanted out you don't accept Amazon's first or second or maybe third offer. You stall for as long as possible to get the best offer. It looks like they played the game perfectly. One billion dollars, residuals and Amazon stock.

    At the end of the day it's a film business. Barbara Broccoli was offered an unimaginable amount of money. She took it. That's human nature, I guess. Loyalty to Bond doesn't come into it.

    I don't mean my comment to be cynical or unkind. Just my gut assessment of what happened. I don't believe Amazon were that shocked when Eon accepted. If you can offer someone a billion dollars it's not a shock if they say "yes!" I feel it's disingenuous for Amazon to say:
    "It is not known what finally tipped the balance, besides the amount of cash, but it "caught everyone here out by surprise."

    Why is it a surprise? You offered Eon a staggering one billion dollars. I don't think it's a surprise they took the money. That's the whole point. Make them an offer they can't refuse.



  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited February 25 Posts: 17,197
    Does the writer of that piece mean 'vitriolic'? Seems the wrong word there.

    I just listened to this week's Rest Is Entertainment where they talked about the situation, and I took it with a pinch of salt to be honest. The main thrust was that Broccoli (who had supposedly been in charge since 'mid way through the Brosnan films) was too attached to Craig and let Craig lead the decision of killing Bond off and couldn't think of a way out of it, and it sounded like Marina Hyde had more been reading forums than talking to people in the know. There's no 'way out of it' to find: he's just a new version of Bond, same as with the case for so many other characters. It's quite a puzzling conversation.

    What I do buy is that she was in a funk and couldn't think of a new spin on it exciting enough to actually want to make- I can totally buy that after doing your ultimate version of it for the last twenty years that the enthusiasm barrel rather runs dry. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but it probably does need someone else who's excited to make something like, say, GoldenEye again- but these guys have done that and there's not much in the way of creative hunger left if you've been there and done that, especially if you have taken it in a creative direction and had massive success with it. No-one is expecting Chris Nolan to ever make a new Batman film again, with another new spin on it, for example.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    QBranch wrote: »
    Guys I'm just bitter at the lack of tech-y, hands-on toy merch that was available up until nearly twenty years ago. It's non-existent now. Who knows, maybe a return of that gear will get more kids interested in Bond.

    What sort of stuff are you thinking of which was out back then, out of interest? I can't remember a huge amount: there were toy guns I guess, Corgi had a go at doing most of the cars, some with gadgets. I can't remember what used to be out.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    mtm wrote: »
    What sort of stuff are you thinking of which was out back then, out of interest? I can't remember a huge amount: there were toy guns I guess, Corgi had a go at doing most of the cars, some with gadgets. I can't remember what used to be out.
    All the tech communication and gadgetry toys, such as watches with light/sound effects, walkie talkies, night vision glasses etc. Smaller items like clocks, radios, microcameras etc. They made you feel like you were Bond on a mission and I stopped seeing this type of merch released after 2006. The Brosnan era was abundant with toys in a similar way to Connery's Bondmania. Sure, you've still got your Corgi cars today but they're made more for display than heavy hands-on play like the gadget-y ones back in the 60s.
  • meshypushymeshypushy Ireland
    Posts: 159
    Certainly up to 80s, there was a range of toys available, in addition to model cars. I seem to remember having a Bond briefcase - I think it had a plastic PPK and other paraphernalia. It was definitely ‘007’ branded.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    I genuinely don't remember that stuff; I've still got my 90s Zeon 007 watch I sent off for from packs of Golden Wonder, but I don't remember there being all that sort of stuff in the Brosnan years?
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    Oh there's heaps. I have most of the Moore and Brosnan era toys now. With Moore it was Vanity Fair/Imperial Toys/Zeon, while Brosnan's were mainly Ericsson and Digital Dream. Then between Brosnan and Craig you had a lot of gear from IMC, first released in Spain, then redesigned for the international market.
  • Posts: 4,663
    I think, because they have gone down the darker, grittier Bond, they have excluded the younger fan base, I was nine when we were all trying to create our own Golden Gun in the school playground
  • Posts: 4,674
    I don’t know how much some of the stuff would appeal to the right audiences, especially in certain countries (I can’t see a Bond briefcase with a small gun inside for the 5-10 demographics being something a big American company like Amazon would be eager to release in said country. I suspect there’d be some overblown controversy, and I think that’s been the case since the 90s. Could be wrong on all counts though). Maybe the toy gadgets if the films lean into them more this time round…. But it’s still quite niche, and as I said I think Bond tends to appeal to kids getting into their teens.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,197
    QBranch wrote: »
    Oh there's heaps. I have most of the Moore and Brosnan era toys now. With Moore it was Vanity Fair/Imperial Toys/Zeon, while Brosnan's were mainly Ericsson and Digital Dream. Then between Brosnan and Craig you had a lot of gear from IMC, first released in Spain, then redesigned for the international market.

    Oh the zippo camera? I feel like I had one of those. Are there examples of any of this stuff anywhere? I don't remember the rest of it. Was it just pre-existing electronic stuff with the 007 logo on?
  • edited February 25 Posts: 4,663
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits) plus (unlike EON) Amazon have a readymade marketing/distribution/retail network in place
  • edited February 25 Posts: 4,674
    patb wrote: »
    Ironically (considering the recent youtube posting), Lego is the perfect way to appeal to a wide cross section of fans, from the detailed DB5, to smaller kits that dads (and mums) can build with their kids to the video game etc. If I was in the Amazon team, Lego would be high on my list to call (also a great way on intergrating EON Bond highlights with Amazon Bond new kits)

    That’d work. There was a planned Bond Lego tie in at some point wasn’t there?
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,864
    mtm wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Oh there's heaps. I have most of the Moore and Brosnan era toys now. With Moore it was Vanity Fair/Imperial Toys/Zeon, while Brosnan's were mainly Ericsson and Digital Dream. Then between Brosnan and Craig you had a lot of gear from IMC, first released in Spain, then redesigned for the international market.

    Oh the zippo camera? I feel like I had one of those. Are there examples of any of this stuff anywhere? I don't remember the rest of it. Was it just pre-existing electronic stuff with the 007 logo on?
    Yes, the Zippo-style camera was by Digital Dream.

    There was a great website called 'Toys of Bond', but can't access it now - looks like the owner sold all his stuff.

    Most of it was made specifically for Bond, but you have a small amount that was existing and rebranded. My most recent purchase is a pair of folding binoculars featuring official JB/007 logo which comes with a generic box that shows an image of an unbranded pair in a different colour. Seen a bit of that over the years.

    What they should do is release toy versions of the tech seen in the latest film or game, complete with related imagery on the packaging. They could've done this with Bond's watch from NTTD. A plastic version with light-up dial. There's an appeal for kids and grown men alike! Some of us are still trying to acquire the toy keyfinder after all these years.
Sign In or Register to comment.