Who should/could be a Bond actor?

112661268127012711272

Comments

  • edited March 22 Posts: 4,920
    Benny wrote: »
    I’m not a fan of Callum Turner and don’t think he’d make a good James Bond.
    It’s just my opinion of him as a person and an actor. I’m not sold. It’s nothing personal.
    If he were cast I would feel disappointed.
    I’d still watch his films and may even enjoy them. Who knows.
    But he’s not an actor I see as a potential Bond.

    Fair enough. Is there any particular reason you feel quite strongly this way and get this impression? From what I've seen him as an actor and in a couple of interviews I think there's definitely a self assured confidence and charisma there that I can see being channeled into a Bond portrayal. Just curious as I just don't see many downsides to him, at least as a contender, and I'd like to think I'd give whoever's cast the benefit of the doubt, even if they weren't my pick. But like I said we're all different.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited March 22 Posts: 17,594
    I think the last time I saw him in anything was The Capture, which I wasn't blown away by him in, but equally I know was a while ago for him and he's risen quite a bit since then so I'd need to see his recent work- directors are clearly finding him interesting and, as you say HallY, he's been modelling for brands too. Keep meaning to check out Masters of the Air.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    Posts: 746
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited March 22 Posts: 8,778
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited March 22 Posts: 2,401
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly. Nobody ever imagined Craig would say something like "Yes, considerably" in that manner. Bond 7 would surely have his own moments that we won't see coming, until it's filmed...and some people might quicky change their favorite Bond actor here to Bond 7, LOL. Some might even start maligning Craig's Bond, like they did to Brosnan's Bond...immediately Craig's Bond impressed in CR.
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 769
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.

    I actually like his performance in Spectre, and what they were doing with the film. I would say Casino is his best Bond performance followed by Spectre. Skyfall is great but he's not exactly "in the saddle for a portion of the film" which lowers it for me. Quantum he's simply just not given enough material to do with beyond looking vengeful the whole time. And NTTD is basically him acting like Benoit Blanc.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,354
    007HallY wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I’m not a fan of Callum Turner and don’t think he’d make a good James Bond.
    It’s just my opinion of him as a person and an actor. I’m not sold. It’s nothing personal.
    If he were cast I would feel disappointed.
    I’d still watch his films and may even enjoy them. Who knows.
    But he’s not an actor I see as a potential Bond.

    Fair enough. Is there any particular reason you feel quite strongly this way and get this impression? From what I've seen him as an actor and in a couple of interviews I think there's definitely a self assured confidence and charisma there that I can see being channeled into a Bond portrayal. Just curious as I just don't see many downsides to him, at least as a contender, and I'd like to think I'd give whoever's cast the benefit of the doubt, even if they weren't my pick. But like I said we're all different.

    Is there a reason why you feel so offended that someone may not see Callum Turner as Bond?
    As I said, it’s just my opinion of him as a person and an actor. I’m not sold. It’s nothing personal
  • Posts: 4,920
    Benny wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Benny wrote: »
    I’m not a fan of Callum Turner and don’t think he’d make a good James Bond.
    It’s just my opinion of him as a person and an actor. I’m not sold. It’s nothing personal.
    If he were cast I would feel disappointed.
    I’d still watch his films and may even enjoy them. Who knows.
    But he’s not an actor I see as a potential Bond.

    Fair enough. Is there any particular reason you feel quite strongly this way and get this impression? From what I've seen him as an actor and in a couple of interviews I think there's definitely a self assured confidence and charisma there that I can see being channeled into a Bond portrayal. Just curious as I just don't see many downsides to him, at least as a contender, and I'd like to think I'd give whoever's cast the benefit of the doubt, even if they weren't my pick. But like I said we're all different.

    Is there a reason why you feel so offended that someone may not see Callum Turner as Bond?
    As I said, it’s just my opinion of him as a person and an actor. I’m not sold. It’s nothing personal

    Oh, I’m not trying to be argumentative. I’m definitely not offended by anyone saying they don’t like an actor for a role. Like I said I’m just genuinely curious as to why specifically you feel that way (it’s a pretty big thing to say you’d be disappointed if an actor was chosen for Bond - don’t get me wrong I can understand the feeling, but it’s quite a big thing to say as a fan).

    It’s more just trying to understand why you get that vibe off of him (or lack thereof for Bond) :)
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,354
    He has a smug face and comes across as a bit cocky.
    Surely there are actors that irk you, that others may like @007HallY ?
  • edited March 23 Posts: 4,920
    Benny wrote: »
    He has a smug face and comes across as a bit cocky.
    Surely there are actors that irk you, that others may like @007HallY ?

    Oh yes, I’ve got actors I don’t like that others like here! Again, I’m not trying to argue or be defensive.

    It’s actually kinda interesting because I’d agree to an extent - Turner does have a sort of self assured confidence to him that I can see being viewed as cocky (I don’t quite get a smug face, but as you said it’s all subjective). For me it’s a major reason why he may have Bond potential. I think Bond should have a bit of cockiness to him at times (it doesn’t quite drift into being unlikeable insofar as it’s a fine line for the actor to play - and personally I don’t think Turner has ever passed that line from what I’ve seen of him - but Bond is a bit of a ba*tard as a character at times and has moments he can drift into arrogance).
  • DaltonforyouDaltonforyou The Daltonator
    Posts: 769
    Benny wrote: »
    He has a smug face and comes across as a bit cocky.
    Surely there are actors that irk you, that others may like @007HallY ?

    Agreed, I saw him and Austin Butler in Master of the Air and both of them are basically pretending they're Emo Spiderman.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,778
    Benny wrote: »
    He has a smug face and comes across as a bit cocky.
    Surely there are actors that irk you, that others may like @007HallY ?

    Come to think of it, there are a few. >:)
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    edited March 23 Posts: 3,261
    Yeah, I see the slightly smug and cocky aspects of Callum Turner, too, tbf. Mind you, seeing as we're going this route, I have to 'fess that I can't abide Theo James. 'Irk' isn't even close to the word for it. Tbh, I think James Corden might be the only one I find more insufferable. Sorry, all! I do see why some of us rate him as a potential Bond and I'd still say he deserved a screentest, it's just that I can't help thinking that he was playing himself in that Inbetweeners movie!
  • Posts: 2,168
    Bond needs to be fully formed when he arrives on screen. Not a newby. Not an angry, mistake making young man with something to prove. Not a disillusioned cynic. But someone who is committed to his country in spite of its flaws and is committed to the mission. The adventure and danger are his oxygen or his drug.

    Perhaps we have already seen the next Bond but don't know it because we haven't pictured him in that role. A versatile actor should be able to play any number of roles. I'm not looking for a Bond who becomes the actor, but an actor who becomes Bond. There are actors and there are personalities. Personalities play themselves, which is why I was not a fan of Moore and Brosnan. Both were good and had their fans, but I saw them more as the actors rather than the character.

    If the next Bond doesn't appear in the PTS, I hope that within fifteen minutes of the opening titles we'll be saying to ourselves "nailed it.!"
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 14,111
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.

    Spectre PTS? Funny, I feel that's the only time it felt like Craig was Bond.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited March 24 Posts: 18,580
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.

    Spectre PTS? Funny, I feel that's the only time it felt like Craig was Bond.

    I got a bit of a Moore vibe from Craig in the NTTD PTS, particularly when he was driving the Aston Martin with Madeleine in beside him. Maybe it was because he was a bit older, into his 50s, but it definitely reminded me of Moore. That's not a bad thing in my book as Moore is one of my favourite Bond actors along with Dalton.
  • Posts: 1,773
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.

    Spectre PTS? Funny, I feel that's the only time it felt like Craig was Bond.

    Craig in SPECTRE is fine. It's as if he doesn't have to prove anything at this point.

  • edited March 25 Posts: 187
    I think one of the main things they've got to do (especially now with Amazon at the helm) is to find an actor that is or seems like he could be on the verge of becoming a big screen movie star, as opposed to someone that's been a TV actor for a decade plus. Lets face it, most of these candidates are decent actors and look decent in a tux, but they're just not big screen stars for whatever reason. They just don't have that "it factor" or whatever you want to call it.

    And honestly it may be more important now that Amazon is doing this. With EON people might at least have thought that Barbara had found another hidden gem like Craig again. But people associate Amazon with shows, aka streaming content. Someone like say Aidan Turner or Theo James or Leo Suter just screams "streaming content" or "James Bond TV show." They are going to want people to believe that Bond will be a big theatrical event again. It needs a proper big screen leading man.

    But they also shouldn't choose someone that's already too famous. And especially one that hasn't been a flop. So hopefully they don't just choose Henry Cavill, the safe pick. Nicholas Hoult has been getting some good film roles lately, so I think he could fit the bill a bit. Though I don't know about him being Lex Luthor and Bond at the same time. That's just too odd. Maybe Mescal, but it sounds like he bombed in the Gladiator movie.

    My pick out of the all of the candidates at this time would be Josh O'Connor. I know a lot of people don't think he looks right for Bond, and I didn't either when I first saw him. But after seeing him in Challengers (produced by Amy Pascal for Amazon by the way), La Chimera, the Aston Martin ad, and some various interviews he has become my favorite. He's got a coolness and charisma about him that starts to come across after actually watching him. And it's more subtle and effortless and comes naturally from the actor, unlike with a try-hard like ATJ. It's not something you can see by just looking at a few pictures. And he seems to be on the verge of stardom. He's about to be starring in the next Knives Out film with DC, and he's in Spielberg's next film as well. I realize the only reply this is going to get is someone saying something about his ears or nose or something, but I'm telling you, I think he has something. And to the person who said he wasn't handsome, a lot of women seem to thirst over him online. And I showed Challengers to my gay male roommate who said he thought he was "hot." So I don't know...

    Josh-OConnor-in-La-Chimera-Credit-Simona-Pampaollona.jpg

    Aston_Martin_DBX_x_Luca_Guadagnino05.jpg

    485851452_1051632633666895_3744213295555071984_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=VEUiwIxZjecQ7kNvgHBrVsf&_nc_oc=AdmrVWU0wBQomrGrppPgfPc7DMBwoqEdbMfjnYw4ZijMfcjAoadsPTbJl47Yqs1rmpCq0SQe5OQ376N4QX0GvP48&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYHed4VfTiu8iHO_TR1B5_ZymStHXWzFlsnAH6brAVijWw&oe=67E8AD9A

    485858601_1051632627000229_8463002052300080385_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_aid=0&_nc_ohc=8BcXPxb87OoQ7kNvgFFhVJm&_nc_oc=Adk-BcOybFutQbtFSi6Lk0ZOAD5S_MA5OvBARA_uYAaJfCp_zXdmutB2FDu76IPeAq3B2vnR4wPyQOM9Tao03Bq-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYGPBSodQelhW-uJwhdYhzEbQPDQHFyA51tGSlqNDLmFNQ&oe=67E8BE30

  • edited March 25 Posts: 1,773
    Well, Josh O'Connor was prince Charles in a famous TV series.

  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,401
    @HarmonyRockets I agree O'Connor would work. I think some of us here, also agree on that.
  • Posts: 693
    Josh O'Connor is my choice personally. He looked very Bondian in some scenes of The Crown.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,621
    I've been saying O'Connor for a while now as well. Of the obvious rising star choices, Mescal and Dickinson, O'Connor seems like the best fit.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,594
    No objections here, he’s a very good actor.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    Posts: 746
    I was quite impressed with him in La Chimera. I wouldn't be disappointed if they picked him.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,997
    Some time ago, someone made an interesting point that perhaps one of the reasons why many people couldn't "see" Craig as Bond when he was cast, is because they were trying to picture him in previous movies, which is understandable given it was people's only frame of reference. But when everyone actually saw him in his own film, playing his own version of the character, and performing dialogue that was probably, at least partially, written specifically for him, he very quickly made sense.

    Exactly, which also applies to people who say Craig will be "a tough act to follow" etc. As if the next guy is going to be doing their best attempt at recreating Craig's Bond, rather than embodying the character on their own terms.

    We've seen Craig try to do a Peirce/Moore portrayal, he's hopeless at it.

    Spectre PTS? Funny, I feel that's the only time it felt like Craig was Bond.

    Craig in SPECTRE is fine. It's as if he doesn't have to prove anything at this point.

    It was my favourite Craig performance. Kind of like Connery in YOLT. Not trying too hard suits cinematic Bond in both cases IMO.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 14,111
    I think one of the main things they've got to do (especially now with Amazon at the helm) is to find an actor that is or seems like he could be on the verge of becoming a big screen movie star, as opposed to someone that's been a TV actor for a decade plus. Lets face it, most of these candidates are decent actors and look decent in a tux, but they're just not big screen stars for whatever reason. They just don't have that "it factor" or whatever you want to call it.

    And honestly it may be more important now that Amazon is doing this. With EON people might at least have thought that Barbara had found another hidden gem like Craig again. But people associate Amazon with shows, aka streaming content. Someone like say Aidan Turner or Theo James or Leo Suter just screams "streaming content" or "James Bond TV show." They are going to want people to believe that Bond will be a big theatrical event again. It needs a proper big screen leading man.

    But they also shouldn't choose someone that's already too famous. And especially one that hasn't been a flop. So hopefully they don't just choose Henry Cavill, the safe pick. Nicholas Hoult has been getting some good film roles lately, so I think he could fit the bill a bit. Though I don't know about him being Lex Luthor and Bond at the same time. That's just too odd. Maybe Mescal, but it sounds like he bombed in the Gladiator movie.

    My pick out of the all of the candidates at this time would be Josh O'Connor. I know a lot of people don't think he looks right for Bond, and I didn't either when I first saw him. But after seeing him in Challengers (produced by Amy Pascal for Amazon by the way), La Chimera, the Aston Martin ad, and some various interviews he has become my favorite. He's got a coolness and charisma about him that starts to come across after actually watching him. And it's more subtle and effortless and comes naturally from the actor, unlike with a try-hard like ATJ. It's not something you can see by just looking at a few pictures. And he seems to be on the verge of stardom. He's about to be starring in the next Knives Out film with DC, and he's in Spielberg's next film as well. I realize the only reply this is going to get is someone saying something about his ears or nose or something, but I'm telling you, I think he has something. And to the person who said he wasn't handsome, a lot of women seem to thirst over him online. And I showed Challengers to my gay male roommate who said he thought he was "hot." So I don't know...

    Josh-OConnor-in-La-Chimera-Credit-Simona-Pampaollona.jpg

    Aston_Martin_DBX_x_Luca_Guadagnino05.jpg

    485851452_1051632633666895_3744213295555071984_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=VEUiwIxZjecQ7kNvgHBrVsf&_nc_oc=AdmrVWU0wBQomrGrppPgfPc7DMBwoqEdbMfjnYw4ZijMfcjAoadsPTbJl47Yqs1rmpCq0SQe5OQ376N4QX0GvP48&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYHed4VfTiu8iHO_TR1B5_ZymStHXWzFlsnAH6brAVijWw&oe=67E8AD9A

    485858601_1051632627000229_8463002052300080385_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_aid=0&_nc_ohc=8BcXPxb87OoQ7kNvgFFhVJm&_nc_oc=Adk-BcOybFutQbtFSi6Lk0ZOAD5S_MA5OvBARA_uYAaJfCp_zXdmutB2FDu76IPeAq3B2vnR4wPyQOM9Tao03Bq-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYGPBSodQelhW-uJwhdYhzEbQPDQHFyA51tGSlqNDLmFNQ&oe=67E8BE30

    Someone suggested him before, and I remember seeing that first image, and thinking that he has a touch of Lewis Collins to him. I think it's the hair.

    rexfeatures-69299b-3-400x240-20131129-115125-862.jpg
  • edited March 26 Posts: 488
    I think one of the main things they've got to do (especially now with Amazon at the helm) is to find an actor that is or seems like he could be on the verge of becoming a big screen movie star, as opposed to someone that's been a TV actor for a decade plus. Lets face it, most of these candidates are decent actors and look decent in a tux, but they're just not big screen stars for whatever reason. They just don't have that "it factor" or whatever you want to call it.

    And honestly it may be more important now that Amazon is doing this. With EON people might at least have thought that Barbara had found another hidden gem like Craig again. But people associate Amazon with shows, aka streaming content. Someone like say Aidan Turner or Theo James or Leo Suter just screams "streaming content" or "James Bond TV show." They are going to want people to believe that Bond will be a big theatrical event again. It needs a proper big screen leading man.

    But they also shouldn't choose someone that's already too famous. And especially one that hasn't been a flop. So hopefully they don't just choose Henry Cavill, the safe pick. Nicholas Hoult has been getting some good film roles lately, so I think he could fit the bill a bit. Though I don't know about him being Lex Luthor and Bond at the same time. That's just too odd. Maybe Mescal, but it sounds like he bombed in the Gladiator movie.

    My pick out of the all of the candidates at this time would be Josh O'Connor. I know a lot of people don't think he looks right for Bond, and I didn't either when I first saw him. But after seeing him in Challengers (produced by Amy Pascal for Amazon by the way), La Chimera, the Aston Martin ad, and some various interviews he has become my favorite. He's got a coolness and charisma about him that starts to come across after actually watching him. And it's more subtle and effortless and comes naturally from the actor, unlike with a try-hard like ATJ. It's not something you can see by just looking at a few pictures. And he seems to be on the verge of stardom. He's about to be starring in the next Knives Out film with DC, and he's in Spielberg's next film as well. I realize the only reply this is going to get is someone saying something about his ears or nose or something, but I'm telling you, I think he has something. And to the person who said he wasn't handsome, a lot of women seem to thirst over him online. And I showed Challengers to my gay male roommate who said he thought he was "hot." So I don't know...

    Josh-OConnor-in-La-Chimera-Credit-Simona-Pampaollona.jpg

    Aston_Martin_DBX_x_Luca_Guadagnino05.jpg

    485851452_1051632633666895_3744213295555071984_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=VEUiwIxZjecQ7kNvgHBrVsf&_nc_oc=AdmrVWU0wBQomrGrppPgfPc7DMBwoqEdbMfjnYw4ZijMfcjAoadsPTbJl47Yqs1rmpCq0SQe5OQ376N4QX0GvP48&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYHed4VfTiu8iHO_TR1B5_ZymStHXWzFlsnAH6brAVijWw&oe=67E8AD9A

    485858601_1051632627000229_8463002052300080385_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_s600x600_tt6&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_aid=0&_nc_ohc=8BcXPxb87OoQ7kNvgFFhVJm&_nc_oc=Adk-BcOybFutQbtFSi6Lk0ZOAD5S_MA5OvBARA_uYAaJfCp_zXdmutB2FDu76IPeAq3B2vnR4wPyQOM9Tao03Bq-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&_nc_gid=gUQ5hXG6AluNPEG6iH_Fvw&oh=00_AYGPBSodQelhW-uJwhdYhzEbQPDQHFyA51tGSlqNDLmFNQ&oe=67E8BE30

    Someone suggested him before, and I remember seeing that first image, and thinking that he has a touch of Lewis Collins to him. I think it's the hair.

    rexfeatures-69299b-3-400x240-20131129-115125-862.jpg

    Josh O’Connor has huge ears. It's not a shallow observation, they're unnaturally sticking out.

    %2Fmethode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F5b9ddaae-199c-11e9-944c-54b267eb465b.jpg?crop=2474%2C3710%2C1552%2C922

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTVMCQ9G0n8Jv50ZcMAeKJKDLkDDbN3NLd_zA&usqp=CAU

    tumblr_inline_pealkn8Jzm1qbb1wr_400.jpg

    If Amazon want to consider him then he should have his ears pinned back. And personally I don't think he looks remotely James Bond but I thought the same about Daniel Craig. The general public accepted him so fair enough.

    I personally don't think there is a stand out candidate for Bond 26. I'm not sure the franchise has any exciting future ahead. I don't have any faith Pascal and Heyman will have any clue who to cast. What do these people know about Bond? Not much or anything.


  • Posts: 6,811
    Daniel Craig has very, very big ears. Just saying. Never found him to be handsome. Alpha male charismatic swaggering brute with a nice physique? Yes. Classically handsome? Nop.
    Were’s a new Dalton when we need one? Does that type still exist? Handsome, rugged, cultured, intense?
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    edited March 26 Posts: 746
    O'Connor is another one who's actually pretty tradBond looking when you break it down; tall, lean, dark-haired, and handsome. I'm sure some will disagree with that last one, but it's undeniable that plenty of women find him attractive. The Grauniad even said he was too handsome and charismatic to be playing Prince Charles.

    I will say, he's a bit of a lightweight, but that's easily rectified with a gym and a trainer. As for his ears, I doubt anyone will notice (or care) after his first few minutes on screen. And he can always grow his hair to cover them a bit.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,449
    I’m not seeing O’ Connor as Bond , but he also doesn’t scream deal breaker; so who know…
Sign In or Register to comment.