Do you believe in ghosts?

1161719212231

Comments

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    I gave you a hug. That s worth 2000 pounds and then some.
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    edited October 2016 Posts: 1,053

    It absolutely should.

    Then we'll have to agree to disagree. I was expressing my opinion as are you and the person you are quoting, however we must remember the position regarding opinions.

    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Of course religion has a warm place in this debate. A clouded mind is a clouded mind; the belief in ghosts and the belief in a divine creator are very much linked. How else does one explain the popular compulsion to invite a priest to clear a haunted house?

    No it doesn't. If any of the people had attempted to give religious connotation to the 'encounters' they related here then it would have relevance. As it stands it is only relevant to those who make their own blind leap of faith in incorrectly suggesting - among other things - that anyone who has experienced 'paranormal' events are religious.

    Tell me exactly where I can find a post in this thread where anyone has claimed to have had their home exorcised? Can't find one? Then I most respectfully suggest that any attempt to broaden the debate is to obfuscate further on the main subject, a subject which no one can bring any concrete evidence to the table.


  • ChriscoopChriscoop North Yorkshire
    Posts: 281
    Surely the holy ghost falls under the thread title?
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    Posts: 1,053
    Chriscoop wrote: »
    Surely the holy ghost falls under the thread title?

    Are you talking about that bloke who goes about the threadbare white sheet draped over his head?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    You mean the Caliph?

    I should be caliph instead of the Caliph.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited October 2016 Posts: 18,348
    You mean the Caliph?

    I should be caliph instead of the Caliph.

    To misquote Lord Mandelson, "We're all Islamonazis now!"
  • Posts: 15,234
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Of course religion has a warm place in this debate. A clouded mind is a clouded mind; the belief in ghosts and the belief in a divine creator are very much linked. How else does one explain the popular compulsion to invite a priest to clear a haunted house?

    To be fair not all theists believe in ghosts. In fact for some the idea that a spirit can and would return from heaven, hell, purgatory or wherever God placed it is heresy, if not blasphemy. And there are people who don't believe in God but do believe in ghosts.

    That said... The same excuses are used to justify the similar extraordinary claims, whether it is the existence of God or ghosts. And we have a few examples here of people believing in both.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Ludovico wrote: »

    That said... The same excuses are used to justify the similar extraordinary claims, whether it is the existence of God or ghosts. .

    Or that the Brosnan era was any good.
  • ChriscoopChriscoop North Yorkshire
    Posts: 281
    stag wrote: »
    Chriscoop wrote: »
    Surely the holy ghost falls under the thread title?

    Are you talking about that bloke who goes about the threadbare white sheet draped over his head?
    The holy ghost, holy spirit, member of the holy trinity. Either way if your discussing ghosts, and some religions have a ghost at their core then religion can also be debated can it not?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Religion, ghosts, the Brosnan era and drugs can always be debated.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    plus Nikki Van Zyl
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,348
    plus Nikki Van Zyl

    Or not as the case may be.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited October 2016 Posts: 24,265
    What I have been trying to do, @stag, is not necessarily to "obfuscate" but to sweep all forms of superstition, belief in the magic, in the supernatural, in "higher entities", ... under the same carpet. Look, I'm not a fool; I know I'm being a bigot and a rude anti-theist. I know I'm deliberately steering this thread towards a science vs all the rest sort of fight. That's because I'm sick and tired of people making utter fools of themselves by neglecting the fundamental teachings of science, while royally feasting on its fruits and meanwhile, to add insult to injury, tell scientists they need to broaden their minds and accept ludicrous notions stolen from fairy tales. So yes, this entire debate, to me at least, really is about throwing every single form of paranormal, supernatural, irrational ... belief in the same box, close it and toss it in the fires of Mount Doom, so that the blind can see again. Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet, you're both ready for the asylum. After millennia of contemplating gods and monsters, angels and demons, hell and earth, ghosts and trolls, ... can we please sit down, study astronomy - not astrology, mind - quantum physics, chemistry, biology, ... and seek enlightenment in things that are true, real and logical for a change? Or shall we continue chasing after the products of make-belief?

    Incidentally, @stag, you commented, not so long ago, on one of my posts as no doubt having taken a lot of time to put together. To be honest, it has. Please understand that English is not my native tongue and that I put a lot of effort into writing some of my posts. Perhaps I lack the vocabulary to build a truly strong case - but my passion reaches far beyond my linguistic skills. Still, I'm pleased to have learned a new word: to obfuscate. :)
  • Posts: 4,617
    "Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet, you're both ready for the asylum."

    Just fantastic, I love this thread

    ^:)^
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    patb wrote: »

    Just fantastic, I love this thread

    ^:)^

    I always suspected you were a worshipper.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    patb wrote: »
    "Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet, you're both ready for the asylum."

    Just fantastic, I love this thread

    ^:)^

    Superb stuff. For someone not writing in their first language you'll do for me Darth.
    Ludovico wrote: »
    To be fair not all theists believe in ghosts. In fact for some the idea that a spirit can and would return from heaven, hell, purgatory or wherever God placed it is heresy, if not blasphemy. And there are people who don't believe in God but do believe in ghosts.

    Sorry it's not an all you can eat buffet. You can't just pick and choose which ones you think it reasonable to believe in and which are ridiculous.

    Once youve crossed the line and chosen to disregard such whimsical notions as evidence, logic and reason in one case then you've automatically signed yourself up for the full set menu of ghosts, dragons, fairies (both tooth and general purpose), UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, the yeti, Santa Claus, God, Allah and England winning the World Cup.
    plus Nikki Van Zyl

    You're derailing the thread here mate. I've been warned about this so I would advise you to cease and desist to avoid the same fate.

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Some continents were delusional in the past, white man.
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    edited October 2016 Posts: 1,053
    Chriscoop wrote: »
    The holy ghost, holy spirit, member of the holy trinity. Either way if your discussing ghosts, and some religions have a ghost at their core then religion can also be debated can it not?

    I've already said this but in my opinion it is getting too far away from the subject of the thread. I'd like to know what religions have ghosts at their core? Is God a Ghost? Is Allah a Ghost? Religion is not my specialist subject so - apart from the spiritualist movement which I think is a church in its own right - the others worship deity's do they not?

    DarthDimi wrote: »
    What I have been trying to do, @stag, is not necessarily to "obfuscate" but to sweep all forms of superstition, belief in the magic, in the supernatural, in "higher entities", ... under the same carpet. Look, I'm not a fool; I know I'm being a bigot and a rude anti-theist. I know I'm deliberately steering this thread towards a science vs all the rest sort of fight. That's because I'm sick and tired of people making utter fools of themselves by neglecting the fundamental teachings of science, while royally feasting on its fruits and meanwhile, to add insult to injury, tell scientists they need to broaden their minds and accept ludicrous notions stolen from fairy tales. So yes, this entire debate, to me at least, really is about throwing every single form of paranormal, supernatural, irrational ... belief in the same box, close it and toss it in the fires of Mount Doom, so that the blind can see again. Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet, you're both ready for the asylum. After millennia of contemplating gods and monsters, angels and demons, hell and earth, ghosts and trolls, ... can we please sit down, study astronomy - not astrology, mind - quantum physics, chemistry, biology, ... and seek enlightenment in things that are true, real and logical for a change? Or shall we continue chasing after the products of make-belief?

    Incidentally, @stag, you commented, not so long ago, on one of my posts as no doubt having taken a lot of time to put together. To be honest, it has. Please understand that English is not my native tongue and that I put a lot of effort into writing some of my posts. Perhaps I lack the vocabulary to build a truly strong case - but my passion reaches far beyond my linguistic skills. Still, I'm pleased to have learned a new word: to obfuscate. :)

    Glad to have been of assistance. You mentioned an earlier post of mine, just for your information I wasn't being facetious I was remarking simply that it was obvious that you had put so much effort into a post (but I felt is was largely wasted because in answering me you did so with a question I had not asked). I already guessed that you weren't a native English speaker - I don't know where you're from but I commend your language skills anyway. To quote from the above "Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet" surely none of these are present in this debate? They are just ordinary folks who believe they witnessed something which they either cannot explain or choose to interpret in their own fashion.

    The fact remains that not one of the 'claimants' (people who have experienced something which they interpret as paranormal activity) have made claims tying those experiences to religion. No one has said 'I've seen the Virgin Mary' or such so why bring it up? Again I say this to both camps.

    Just for clarification I'm an atheist. That said I defend anyone's right to hold religious beliefs. I'm not a bigot. As far as I'm concerned it's a short walk between intolerance and something much darker.

    I don't like it when I see people being vilified for something they believe in or have genuinely (yet most likely mistakenly) experienced. I already set out my point of view and am at least glad to see the sneering and jeering has largely subsided.

    It's always best - in my opinion of course - to win a debate by the application of reason and not by sniggering and finger pointing. The application of reasoned debate should actually win people over to your way of thinking - the mob mentality as witnessed across these pages (up until the last few pages anyway) will do nothing but alienate you from the very people you are trying to convert.

    You're don't have to convince me, you have to convince those who believe in ghosts.

    Lastly and just to clarify, when I use the word 'you' beyond the first paragraph I mean you non believers in ghosts.

    Thank you.




  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,265
    That's a clear and interesting post, @stag. You know, I think we could get along. ;-)
  • Posts: 15,234
    patb wrote: »
    "Whether you're a religious zealot protesting against the teachings of evolution in schools, or you're a self-proclaimed ghost hunter defecating his gruesomely stupid ideas all over the Internet, you're both ready for the asylum."

    Just fantastic, I love this thread

    ^:)^

    Superb stuff. For someone not writing in their first language you'll do for me Darth.
    Ludovico wrote: »
    To be fair not all theists believe in ghosts. In fact for some the idea that a spirit can and would return from heaven, hell, purgatory or wherever God placed it is heresy, if not blasphemy. And there are people who don't believe in God but do believe in ghosts.

    Sorry it's not an all you can eat buffet. You can't just pick and choose which ones you think it reasonable to believe in and which are ridiculous.

    Once youve crossed the line and chosen to disregard such whimsical notions as evidence, logic and reason in one case then you've automatically signed yourself up for the full set menu of ghosts, dragons, fairies (both tooth and general purpose), UFOs, the Loch Ness monster, the yeti, Santa Claus, God, Allah and England winning the World Cup.
    plus Nikki Van Zyl

    You're derailing the thread here mate. I've been warned about this so I would advise you to cease and desist to avoid the same fate.

    Of course you cannot pick and choose and both beliefs (in God or ghosts) are unsupported by evidence. But don't ask a believer to be consequential. And we've seen here people whose belief in ghosts have pretty much the same origin as their belief in God.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Two spacecraft sent to Mars and both crash in similar ways only minutes from landing ?
    I'm beginning to believe in Martians ! :))
  • Posts: 4,617
    "The application of reasoned debate should actually win people over"

    30358951922_a3c158e79c.jpghouse_md_religious_en_500 by pat.beardmore, on Flickr
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    :)) =D>
  • ChriscoopChriscoop North Yorkshire
    Posts: 281
    @stag, I was merely making the point that Christians have " the father, the son and the holy ghost " the holy ghost is considered equal to God the father and God the son. Therefore the question do you believe in ghosts is pertinent in this situation as it would be for someone who believes in poltergeists singing from their chandeliers. Incidently I'm both atheist and agnostic.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Before Christianity the trinity pagans used to worship was ....
    The grandmother, Mother and Daughter. ;)
    I guess they weren't as misogynistic :D
  • MrcogginsMrcoggins Following in the footsteps of Quentin Quigley.
    Posts: 3,144
    In God We Trust all others pay cash.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    @DarthDimi, I would just like to say that if I weren't your friend, I would have guessed-judging from your posts-that you were beyond a shadow of a doubt a native English speaker. I have been moved and vindicated in many of my own thoughts on many matters reading your fine posts over the past five years, as they are always well structured, argued and written to expert effect. Your intellect and impressive thirst for study and education shine through in every word. Your language and ability to think in text to express ideas dwarf the attempts of an overwhelming portion of people in my country alone, I truly mean that.
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    edited October 2016 Posts: 1,053
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    That's a clear and interesting post, @stag. You know, I think we could get along. ;-)

    Honestly, I never thought we weren't getting along.
    patb wrote: »
    "The application of reasoned debate should actually win people over"

    30358951922_a3c158e79c.jpghouse_md_religious_en_500 by pat.beardmore, on Flickr

    Who's speaking about religious people? I'm not. Anyone who has read my post knows full well that I am referring to people who claim to have experienced paranormal phenomenon so in future please do not take any of my posts and place them out of context.

    I have never seen this programme but I guess the person in question is a fictional character? Quoting passages from fictional characters is rather like quoting god I suppose.

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    I knew you two would, not to would have been ..... An Ungentlemanly Act ;)
  • stagstag In the thick of it!
    edited October 2016 Posts: 1,053
    Chriscoop wrote: »
    @stag, I was merely making the point that Christians have " the father, the son and the holy ghost " the holy ghost is considered equal to God the father and God the son. Therefore the question do you believe in ghosts is pertinent in this situation as it would be for someone who believes in poltergeists singing from their chandeliers. Incidently I'm both atheist and agnostic.

    Because I'm unfamiliar with the detail surrounding the 'holy ghost' (though I never interpreted it as being the same as ghosts in the paranormal sense anyway) I looked on the net for a definition. The search returned the following:

    Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost is a term found in English translations of the Bible that is understood differently among the Abrahamic religions. Holy Spirit is stated to be "a realm beyond the ability of words to properly convey. It must be experienced, realized, kindled within like a holy fire." The term is also used to describe aspects of other religions and belief structures.

    The definition of a ghost in the context of this thread is (my words) the manifestation of a dead person is it not?

    There appears no connection between the 'holy ghost' and the ghosts we are speaking about here, thus speaking about the holy ghost has no relevance other than to introduce a topic which is not in keeping with the subject of the thread.

    I should like some to show me where any of the yes camp have expressed cross beliefs. I believe in ghosts therefore I believe in fairies/god/dragons/aliens et al. In fact let's ask them. Does anyone here who has witnessed a 'paranormal' event believe in the Loch Ness monster, aliens, god, fairies, dragons or other beings or creatures?










Sign In or Register to comment.