No Time To Die: Production Diary

1150915101512151415152507

Comments

  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    bondjames wrote: »
    Lindy Hemming who is that?
    Costume designer on earlier Bond films including CR. Has an eye for putting our hero in well fitted suits, rather than spandex lookalikes that split in the pant section on set (which is what, regrettably and embarrasingly, happened with current designer Jany Temime's ill fitting concoctions during filming of SP).

    Hemming is one of the best.

    Did Craig really split his pants? I thought this was just a humorous rumor to prove a point about the slim-fitting suits.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    DonnyDB5 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Lindy Hemming who is that?
    Costume designer on earlier Bond films including CR. Has an eye for putting our hero in well fitted suits, rather than spandex lookalikes that split in the pant section on set (which is what, regrettably and embarrasingly, happened with current designer Jany Temime's ill fitting concoctions during filming of SP).

    Hemming is one of the best.

    Did Craig really split his pants? I thought this was just a humorous rumor to prove a point about the slim-fitting suits.
    It happened at Blofeld HQ. There's an interview online where Seydoux has a giggle over it (I don't think it went down well that she mentioned that).
  • Goldeneye0094Goldeneye0094 Conyers, GA
    Posts: 464
    I would think it would make sense for boyle to bring back key crew members from casino royale for bond 25 and remind us with craig's swansong why we fell in love with his bond in the first place
  • Posts: 6,601
    Get us Lindy and I will be happy
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited May 2018 Posts: 8,399
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.
  • Posts: 19,339
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,399
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    I agree, I fear we might get a YOLT/DAF performance out of him. If he was serious about ending on a high they should have gotten around to it by 2018 at the latest. That's plenty of "rest time".
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,217
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.

    Every stunt in Tomorrow Never Dies shits all over the action scenes in Spectre, not always in concept but definitely in execution.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.
    I say BS.
  • mattjoesmattjoes Julie T. and the M.G.'s
    Posts: 7,021
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.
    Interesting, that´s complete news to me.
    Indeed. The Brosnan era had some terrific action.

    bondjames wrote: »
    Lindy Hemming who is that?
    Costume designer on earlier Bond films including CR. Has an eye for putting our hero in well fitted suits, rather than spandex lookalikes that split in the pant section on set (which is what, regrettably and embarrasingly, happened with current designer Jany Temime's ill fitting concoctions during filming of SP).

    Hemming is one of the best.
    And she dressed Brosnan, who always looked impeccable.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,399
    Here we are summer 2018, and still no further. If we don't hear anything before the end of the month, that's a signal that something isn't right behind the scenes. If they stick to schedule, we should have a full press conference at the end of the year, where all is revealed. We can better asses Craig's appearance and motivation there, where he has nowhere to hide. The SP reveal was a bit of a shambles, and where people started to note Craig was looking older.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,138
    Here we are summer 2018, and still no further. If we don't hear anything before the end of the month, that's a signal that something isn't right behind the scenes. If they stick to schedule, we should have a full press conference at the end of the year, where all is revealed. We can better asses Craig's appearance and motivation there, where he has nowhere to hide. The SP reveal was a bit of a shambles, and where people started to note Craig was looking older.

    Based on what?
    What signal is it and why?

    If we don't hear anything by the end of the month, then EON has decided not to pass on any news. I'm not sure why some think it's a fans right to know everything, all of the time.
    They give us news when they're ready.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Bond 25 will be under 130 minutes, shorter than Goldeneye and Living Daylights. We know that much since Boyle has never made a film longer than that.

    excellent!
  • Posts: 1,162
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.
    Interesting, that´s complete news to me.

    My bad. I forgot about the tank scene, which I don’t really like, but it was really something new. Apart from that I’m really hard pressed hand I am one of those who enjoy Brosnan’s tenure quite a bit more than the current one )
  • Posts: 1,162
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.

    Every stunt in Tomorrow Never Dies shits all over the action scenes in Spectre, not always in concept but definitely in execution.

    As I already mentioned, I don’t see any action in SP
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,399
    boldfinger wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.
    Interesting, that´s complete news to me.

    My bad. I forgot about the tank scene, which I don’t really like, but it was really something new. Apart from that I’m really hard pressed hand I am one of those who enjoy Brosnan’s tenure quite a bit more than the current one )

    The stealth boat fight.
  • SuperintendentSuperintendent A separate pool. For sharks, no less.
    Posts: 871
    It would be great to have Lindy Hemming back, but unfortunately, I think they are perfectly happy with Jany Temime. Arnold's return is more likely, IMO.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    Posts: 1,756
    Quite liked the acton sequences in the Brosnan era, actually.
    Beats anything the Mendes era brought.

    The Shanghai fist fight would like to have a word with you.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Quite liked the acton sequences in the Brosnan era, actually.
    Beats anything the Mendes era brought.
    The Shanghai fist fight would like to have a word with you.
    Let it come.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,217
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    No. He wasn't involved since DAD.

    And this is why am bit deflated Now! I don't rate Armstrong at all! A throwback to the dreaded Brossa era... I always found his action sequences to be drawn out, tedious and without much invention. All gunfire and explosions..Yawn! .This is disappointing news! I would have preferred Dan Bradley to return.

    Quite. It’s hard to think of a single original action scene in any of Brosnan’s movies. Not hard to come up with quite a few embarrassing ones though.

    Every stunt in Tomorrow Never Dies shits all over the action scenes in Spectre, not always in concept but definitely in execution.

    As I already mentioned, I don’t see any action in SP

    Ah, I see. It wasn't mentioned to me so I must have missed it. Alas, the point still stands. It's good that Armstrong is back. He did pretty good work during the Brosnan era. The only missteps were the admittedly poor ski chase and the submarine finale in TWINE, and "that" surf scene from DAD.

    He didn't work on GE but the action in TND is some of the best we've ever had in the series.

    Though, as someone else suggested, Dan Bradley would have been a good choice to bring back too.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!
  • Posts: 12,837
    I'm not against Armstrong being back because overall I liked the Brosnan era's action scenes, but it doesn't exactly excite me either. Safe pair of hands I guess. Bond 25 is shaping up to be something that I would have been excited for if they'd got it out quicker, but is just coming across as a real anti climax after such a long wait. I want to be excited because I love Danny Boyle but so far he's literally the only person involved who's name has me interested. Apart from him it all just seems so boring and stale so far imo.
  • Posts: 787
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    It's absolutely fair play to Dan, and I don't begrudge him taking home a king's ransom. But I think EON would want to be a bit careful about messaging this: it could be easy for the "only in it for the money" narrative to spin out of control a bit.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,399
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    Sean gave his fee to his charity. Something tells me Craig won't be doing the same.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    Sean gave his fee to his charity. Something tells me Craig won't be doing the same.

    He will spend it on make-up and plastic surgery.
  • Posts: 6,601
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    Sean gave his fee to his charity. Something tells me Craig won't be doing the same.

    He dorsnt need to. He is giving to charity all the time. Remember his Aston? Plus normally he is not going public with it, but it comes out here and there. So rest assured, this money isnt all going into his own pocket.
  • Posts: 6,601
    BTW, how are Turners charities coming along? Heard of any?
  • Posts: 1,162
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    Sean gave his fee to his charity. Something tells me Craig won't be doing the same.

    He will spend it on make-up and plastic surgery.

    Then there will be hardly some change left.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,399
    barryt007 wrote: »
    https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/959475/James-Bond-25-Daniel-Craig-net-worth-Sean-Connery-James-Bond-Sunday-Times-Rich-List

    Craig apparently the highest paid Bond. Over 25 million for Bond 25, now we know why he came back.

    As I've said on here before,they sould get rid of him now,and get someone new,younger and keen on a lot smaller salary.

    He is only coming back for one big,final payday.

    The nerve of the guy. Good job no-one else did that…oh, sorry Sean, forgot about DAF!

    Sean gave his fee to his charity. Something tells me Craig won't be doing the same.

    He will spend it on make-up and plastic surgery.

    Then there will be hardly some change left.

    I think he already had some work done. He looks different to the BAFTAs appearance. Likely a Boyle script will incorporate his age into the equation, so it's not the end of the world. But it is upsetting for those of us hoping for a bit more of the "Men want to be him, woman want to lay next to him" Bond of old.
  • BondAficionadoBondAficionado Former IMDBer
    Posts: 1,889
    Bond 25 will be under 130 minutes, shorter than Goldeneye and Living Daylights. We know that much since Boyle has never made a film longer than that.
    Nobody knows how long the run-time will be, but... There was a survey about this last month. Despite the survey sample being relatively small, there was still a decent percentage of people who want the next film to be centered around 130 minutes, with a preference to be nearer 140, rather than 120, if possible.

Sign In or Register to comment.